ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

情绪动机对人际情绪调节策略选择的影响:来自行为与超扫描的实验证据

何从莲, 袁加锦   

  1. 四川师范大学脑与心理科学研究院纪检监察心理与行为四川省哲社重点实验室, 四川 610066 中国
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-31 修回日期:2025-05-07 接受日期:2025-05-16
  • 基金资助:
    四川省杰出青年科学基金(2023NSFSC1938); 国家自然科学基金(NSFC31971018); 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(24XJA190003)

The Influence of Emotional Motivation on Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Strategy Choice: Evidence from Behavioral and Hyperscanning

HE Conglian, YUAN Jiajin   

  1. , 610066, China
  • Received:2024-05-31 Revised:2025-05-07 Accepted:2025-05-16

摘要: 人际情绪调节是社会互动中的一方(调节者)有目的地帮助另一方(目标者)控制情绪的过程。本研究通过两个实验考察情绪动机(包括动机强度和方向)对人际情绪调节策略选择的影响,同时探索这种影响背后的神经机制。结果发现在回避动机条件下,被试在调节自己情绪时都倾向于选择认知重评和注意转移等调节性策略,且该倾向不受动机强度的影响;当调节他人情绪时,虽然被试也表现出对上述两种策略的偏好,但随着动机强度的提高,被试选择认知重评的倾向显著低于注意转移。在趋近动机条件下被试并未表现出对任何调节策略的偏好。近红外成像数据显示,调节者右侧前额叶的激活能够显著正向预测他们为目标者选择调节策略的倾向;而左侧颞顶联合区(TPJ)的激活水平能显著负向预测他们为目标者选择认知重评的偏好,右侧TPJ激活则能正向预测对观察策略(不调节)的选择偏好。不仅如此,超扫描数据表明调节者与目标者在背外侧前额叶(dlPFC)和TPJ上的脑间同步活动水平越高,调节者越有可能使用认知重评调节目标者的回避动机情绪。上述结果为人际情绪调节策略选择的影响因素及其神经机制提供了新的理解。

关键词: 情绪调节策略选择, 人际情绪调节, 内部情绪调节, 情绪动机, 脑间同步性

Abstract: Interpersonal emotion regulation refers to the process by which individuals help others control their emotions during social interaction. Social situations are complex and changeable, and it has been suggested that it is of great importance to choose between different strategies in different contexts. Based on the theory of emotion motivation, the current study explores the influence of motivational intensity and direction on interpersonal emotion regulation choice through one behavioral experiment. Then, based on the main findings of Experiment 1, the Experiment 2 further explored the neural mechanism underlying the effect. The present study used the Emotion Regulation Choice Task (ERCT) to explore the effect of emotional motivation, including the motivational intensity and direction, on interpersonal emotion regulation choice (Experiment 1), and to explore the neural mechanism underlying the regulator's strategy choice behavior using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning technique (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 used a within-subjects design with 2 (motivational direction: withdrawal-motivated emotion vs. approach-motivated emotion ) × 2 (motivational intensity: high vs. low) × 2 (task type: intrapersonal ERCT vs. interpersonal ERCT) format. A total of 40 participants were required to choose one of emotion regulation strategies including distraction, reappraisal or watch in the Emotion Regulation Choice Task (ERCT). In the final analysis, the data of 33 valid subjects (4 male and 29 female) were included. Based on the main findings of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 focused on the intensity of withdrawal-motivated emotion and used a 2 (intensity of withdrawal-motivated emotion: high vs. low) × 2 (task type: intrapersonal ERCT vs. interpersonal ERCT) format. 44 female friend dyads participated in Experiment 2. In experiment 1, we found that in withdrawal-motivated emotion, the regulatory strategies including cognitive reappraisal and distraction were chosen more often over watch in the intrapersonal ERCT and interpersonal ERCT. However, participants did not show preference for the three strategies under the condition of approach-motivated emotion. Moreover, the results showed that participants’ preference for reappraisal decreased with the increase of motivational intensity when regulating emotion of themselves. During the process of regulating another personal’s emotion, participants tended to choose cognitive reappraisal whereas showed no preference for different strategies in the condition of approach-motivated emotion. In Experiment 2, the behavioral results show that reappraisal was chosen more often over distraction in low-intensity withdrawal-motivated emotion, while no difference between these two strategies in high-intensity withdrawal-motivated emotion. The brain imaging results showed that, in the context of low-intensity withdrawal-motivated emotion, the activation of right prefrontal cortex (PFC) could positively predicted the regulator’s preference for regulatory strategies when regulating target’s emotion. And the higher activation in left temporoparietal junction (TPJ) was associated with less choice of reappraisal, while the significant activation in regulator’s right TPJ could prompt more choice of observation. Besides, the higher brain-to-brain synchrony between regulator and target in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) was associated with regulator’s lower preference for reappraisal while higher level of interbrain synchrony in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and TPJ could predict more frequently choice of reappraisal. The results of this study provided insights into people’s choice of strategies when regulating others’ emotion in different motivational context and its neural mechanism. Our findings expand the current understanding of the influencing factors of interpersonal emotion regulation strategy choice.

Key words: Emotion regulation choice, intrapersonal emotion regulation, interpersonal emotion regulation, the motivational dimension of affect, neural synchronization